SPACE FLIGHT SYSTEMS RADIOISOTOPE POWER SYSTEMS PROGRAM OFFICE NATIONAL CENTER FOR SPACE EXPLORATION RESEARCH EXTERNAL PARTNERS EDUCATION/OUTREACH SPACE EXPLORATION BENEFITS PROGRAM SUPPORT IMAGE GALLERY


ISS RESEARCH PROJECT LINKS

GRC MICROGRAVITY & TECHNOLOGY FLIGHT EXPERIMENTS

SAME RELATED DOCUMENTS

SAME RELATED LINKS



.

header graphic
Smoke Aerosol Measurement Experiment-Reflight (SAME-R)


      SAME in MSGSAME in MSG  
       
      acrobat icon
SAME-R Overview Chart
 
         
     
SAME-R Status

May 2010 - The Smoke Aerosol Measurement Experiment-Reflight (SAME-R) hardware was launched to ISS aboard Atlantis on May 14, 2010.

April 2010 - The Smoke Aerosol Measurement Experiment-Reflight (SAME-R) team held its Executive Systems Acceptance Review on April 23, 2010.  The SAR-2 Board approved the SAME-R hardware for shipment.  The hardware shipped on April 25, 2010 and was turned over on April 26, 2010 to Kennedy Space Center (KSC) personnel. 

The Smoke Aerosol Measurement Experiment-Reflight (SAME-R) team held its Engineering Systems Acceptance Review on April 16, 2010.

The Smoke Aerosol Measurement Experiment-Reflight (SAME-R) team has submitted the Phase III Safety Data Package to Glenn Research Center (GRC) for final review and approval, prior to holding an out-of-board Safety Review with the Johnson Space Center (JSC) Payload Safety Review Panel.




Background/Overview

Smoke is a general term that encompasses aerosol materials produced by a number of processes.  In particular it can include unburned, recondensed, original polymer or pyrolysis products that can be liquid, solid, carbonaceous soot, condensed water vapor, or ash particles.  Soot particles dominate the smoke particulate in established flaming fires while unburned pyrolysis products and recondensed polymer fragments are produced by smoldering and pyrolysis in the early stage of fire growth.  Given the constrained space on any spacecraft, the target for the fire detection system is necessarily the early phase and not established flaming fires; consequently, the primary target for detection is the pyrolysis products and not the soot.

Schematic of the SAME hardware
Schematic of the SAME hardware

Prior spacecraft systems are summarized in more detail in papers by Friedman and Urban. In the Mercury, Gemini and Apollo missions, the crew quarters were limited and mission durations were short. Consequently it was considered reasonable that the astronauts would rapidly detect any fire. The Skylab module, however, included approximately 30 UV-sensing fire detectors.1 These devices were limited to line-of-sight and were reported to have difficulties with false alarms.  The Space Shuttle (Space Transportation System (STS)) detectors were based upon ionization fire detector technology, the most advanced technology available at the time and used an inertial separator designed to eliminate particles larger than 1-2 micrometers. The International Space Station (ISS) smoke detectors use near-IR forward scattering, rendering them most sensitive to particles larger than a micrometer, outside of the range of sensitivity of the shuttle detector.

More details of the ISS and STS detector requirements are presented by Steisslinger et al. 3 however the basic details are summarized below.  The STS detector, as built, was designed to alarm at 2 mg/m3 (based on 1 micrometer particles) or 0.022 mg/m3/s rise in concentration for 20 seconds.  The ISS detector was designed to alarm at obscuration of 1% per foot using an Underwriters Laboratory (UL) smoke box and a white light extinction meter.  This was implemented using a transfer standard detector and a 0.5 micrometer polystyrene latex-bead aerosol system that was used to set the amplifiers on each unit.  The transfer standard was calibrated in the smoke box and then used to set the levels with the aerosol system.

 As described by Friedman there have been six overheat and failed component failures in the NASA Orbiter fleet in addition to several similar incidents that have occurred on the ISS. None of these events spread into a real fire but as mission durations increase, the likelihood of failures increases. The experience on Mir in 1997 has shown that failure of oxygen generation systems can have significant consequences. As a result, improved understanding of spacecraft fire detection is critically needed.

Previous work on smoke particles from low-gravity sources by Urban et al. found that the particulate produced by low-gravity flames (soot or unburned fuel particles) tends to have larger size particles than in normal gravity.  Results from the CSD (Comparative Soot Diagnostics) Experiment which studied smoke properties in low-gravity from several spacecraft materials suggested that liquid smoke particles could achieve sizes larger than 1 µm while solid particulate remained in the sub-micrometer range.  However, the CSD experiment did not produce sufficient data concerning the size of the liquid smoke particles to guide detector design. The combined impact of these limited results and theoretical predictions is that, as opposed to extrapolation from 1-g data, direct knowledge of low-g combustion particulate is needed for more confident design of smoke detectors for spacecraft. 







Project Management:


Contacts at NASA Glenn Research Center

Project Manager: William Sheredy
William.A.Sheredy@nasa.gov
216-433-3685

Project Scientist: Dr. Gary Ruff
Gary.A.Ruff@nasa.gov
216-433-5697

Principal Investigator: Dr. David Urban. NASA GRC
David.L.Urban@nasa.gov
216-433-2835

Co-Investigator: Dr. George Mulholland, U. of Maryland

Co-Investigator: Dr. Zeng-Guang Yuan, NCMR

Co-Investigator: Dr. Jiann Yang, NIST

Co-Investigator: Dr. Thomas Cleary, NIST

Engineering Team: ZIN Tech., Inc.


Smoke Aerosol Measurement Experiment-Reflight (SAME-R) News

 

 

 

 

 

 

View Archives